They reported core-to-core latency on the order of 28-30ns for the 11700 vs 19-24ns for their 10700k part. IIRC from Anandtech's review, they were speculating it was because the larger physical die size of Intel's 14nm part caused intra-core communication to be slower compared to AMD's 7nm parts. I am thinking the 5800X is tuned for all cores (or stock at say 4.45GHz) and not a single maximum thread clock (which might go to ~4.85Ghz according to THW 5800X review).Īdmin said:We don't know why the 5800X makes up all its performance losses from the single-threaded test in the multi-threaded test, but it could be due to reduced turbo frequencies on the Core i9 part, as well as architectural differences between the two chips. The i9-11900K score looks legit though (4.7GHz all core boost). Like saying I can boot into W10 at 5.9GHz and start CPU-Z and I can boot into W10 and run a single thread bench at 5.3GHz in CPU-Z (getting a 714 in multicore strongly suggests a single thread is all that CPU-Z could see). Like no AMD 5000 series CPU's in the overall ranking chart, the highest I see is a 3950X.Īlso it looks like single core maximum OC as there is no multicore score for the i7-11700K (at 5.3GHz) and no single or multicore scores for the i9-11900K at 5.9GHz. The comparison chart is basically overclocked RL numbers vs others cpu's at stock.Several things are odd at my end. If you just read the link here and don't look at whats on twitter it just looks like stock numbers. However there is no mention in the article that the numbers are from an overclocked system. While this one posted today are all overclocked numbers. Makaveli said:Yes the Chart above minus the 11900k at 5.2 look to all be stock numbers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |